Macgregor vs Mount Gravatt, QLD suburb comparison

Macgregor for families and schools; Mount Gravatt for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MacgregorMount Gravatt

Overall score

Macgregor

53.2/100

Mount Gravatt

59.2/100

Crime rate

Macgregor

47.4 / 1k

Mount Gravatt

60.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Macgregor

162

Mount Gravatt

237

Population

Macgregor

5,980

Mount Gravatt

3,733

Metric leadMacgregor 4Mount Gravatt 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMacgregorMount Gravatt
Overall score53.2/10059.2/100
Housing (desirability)30.2/10047.6/100
Crime rate47.4 / 1k60.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools810
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops3425
Walkability51.0/10073.0/100
Nearby amenities162237
Population5,9803,733
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Macgregor is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Mount Gravatt is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Macgregor keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Macgregor pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Gravatt is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Macgregor sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Gravatt.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Gravatt, while Macgregor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons