Overall score
Macgregor
53.2/100
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Macgregor for families and schools; Mount Gravatt for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Macgregor
53.2/100
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Crime rate
Macgregor
47.4 / 1k
Mount Gravatt
60.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Macgregor
162
Mount Gravatt
237
Population
Macgregor
5,980
Mount Gravatt
3,733
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Macgregor | Mount Gravatt |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.2/100 | 59.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.2/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.4 / 1k | 60.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 25 |
| Walkability | 51.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 162 | 237 |
| Population | 5,980 | 3,733 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Macgregor is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Mount Gravatt is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Macgregor keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Macgregor pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Gravatt is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Macgregor sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Gravatt.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Gravatt, while Macgregor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.