Meadows vs Mount Barker, SA suburb comparison

Meadows for retirees and investment; Mount Barker for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MeadowsMount Barker

Overall score

Meadows

55.9/100

Mount Barker

60.9/100

Crime rate

Meadows

8.3 / 1k

Mount Barker

29.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Meadows

50

Mount Barker

250

Population

Meadows

1,717

Mount Barker

18,330

Metric leadMeadows 4Mount Barker 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMeadowsMount Barker
Overall score55.9/10060.9/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10047.6/100
Crime rate8.3 / 1k29.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools29
Public transport stops564
Walkability32.5/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities50250
Planning activity31450
Population1,71718,330
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Meadows is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Barker is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Barker sits among greener hillside streets, while Meadows keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Meadows tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Barker stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.

Retirees and investors may find Meadows the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Barker.

Related comparisons