Overall score
Melbourne
58.2/100
Gosnells
53.8/100
Melbourne for retirees; Gosnells for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Melbourne
58.2/100
Gosnells
53.8/100
Crime rate
Melbourne
334.5 / 1k
Gosnells
553.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Melbourne
2,453
Gosnells
449
Population
Melbourne
54,941
Gosnells
21,149
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Melbourne | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.2/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 1.2/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 334.5 / 1k | 553.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 19 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 400 | 143 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2,453 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 640 | — |
| Population | 54,941 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Melbourne is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Melbourne sits closer to the city centre, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.
Melbourne pulls ahead on schools and education options and public transport access, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Melbourne sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.
Choose Melbourne if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Gosnells for families and investors.