Melbourne vs Gosnells suburb comparison (VIC vs WA)

Melbourne for retirees; Gosnells for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MelbourneGosnells

Overall score

Melbourne

58.2/100

Gosnells

53.8/100

Crime rate

Melbourne

334.5 / 1k

Gosnells

553.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Melbourne

2,453

Gosnells

449

Population

Melbourne

54,941

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadMelbourne 8Gosnells 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMelbourneGosnells
Overall score58.2/10053.8/100
Housing (desirability)1.2/10038.2/100
Crime rate334.5 / 1k553.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools117
Parks & reserves1940
Public transport stops400143
Walkability100.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities2,453449
Planning activity640
Population54,94121,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Melbourne is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Melbourne sits closer to the city centre, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.

Melbourne pulls ahead on schools and education options and public transport access, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Melbourne sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.

Choose Melbourne if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Gosnells for families and investors.

Related comparisons