Overall score
Middle Swan
41.8/100
Viveash
38.5/100
Middle Swan for investment and value; Viveash for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Middle Swan
41.8/100
Viveash
38.5/100
Crime rate
Middle Swan
3220.0 / 1k
Viveash
7130.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Middle Swan
59
Viveash
17
Population
Middle Swan
2,852
Viveash
1,280
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Middle Swan | Viveash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.8/100 | 38.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 31.4/100 | 13.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 3220.0 / 1k | 7130.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 8 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 12.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 59 | 17 |
| Population | 2,852 | 1,280 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 6/10 |
Middle Swan reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Viveash is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.
On the data, Middle Swan is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Viveash answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. Middle Swan generally means more approachable housing costs, while Viveash leans toward more sought-after housing.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Middle Swan the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Viveash.