Overall score
Middle Swan
40.1/100
West Swan
42.2/100
Middle Swan for retirees and families; West Swan for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Middle Swan
40.1/100
West Swan
42.2/100
Crime rate
Middle Swan
43.1 / 1k
West Swan
43.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Middle Swan
101
West Swan
53
Population
Middle Swan
2,852
West Swan
786
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Middle Swan | West Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.1/100 | 42.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.4/100 | 38.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.1 / 1k | 43.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 19 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 101 | 53 |
| Green cover | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Population | 2,852 | 786 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Middle Swan is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and West Swan is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Middle Swan tends to lead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, while West Swan stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer West Swan, while Middle Swan remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.