Minyama vs Warana, QLD Suburb Comparison

Minyama for investment; Warana for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MinyamaWarana

Overall score

Minyama

51.6/100

Warana

54.0/100

Crime rate

Minyama

46.8 / 1k

Warana

47.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Minyama

77

Warana

98

Population

Minyama

2,726

Warana

3,831

Metric leadMinyama 4Warana 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMinyamaWarana
Overall score51.6/10054.0/100
Housing (desirability)52.9/10046.4/100
Crime rate46.8 / 1k47.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves85
Public transport stops48
Walkability27.0/10043.0/100
Nearby amenities7798
Green cover4.2%10.9%
Population2,7263,831
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/105/10

Comparison summary

Minyama reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Warana is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Where Warana is shaped by the coast, Minyama offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Minyama tends to lead on parks and reserves, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Warana stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

Households prioritising schools may find Minyama the better fit, while families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Warana.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons