Mount Richon vs Seville Grove, WA Suburb Comparison

Mount Richon for families and investment; Seville Grove for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount RichonSeville Grove

Overall score

Mount Richon

34.1/100

Seville Grove

33.8/100

Crime rate

Mount Richon

60.1 / 1k

Seville Grove

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Richon

13

Seville Grove

133

Population

Mount Richon

2,067

Seville Grove

11,408

Metric leadMount Richon 4Seville Grove 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount RichonSeville Grove
Overall score34.1/10033.8/100
Housing (desirability)51.8/10046.9/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools53
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—8
Public transport stops447
Walkability6.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities13133
Green cover0.1%9.0%
Population2,06711,408
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Mount Richon reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Seville Grove is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Mount Richon sits among greener hillside streets, while Seville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Richon is stronger for schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Seville Grove answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Mount Richon suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Seville Grove is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons