Overall score
Robina
58.5/100
Murray Bridge
35.4/100
Robina for retirees and families; Murray Bridge for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Robina
58.5/100
Murray Bridge
35.4/100
Crime rate
Robina
42.8 / 1k
Murray Bridge
100.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Robina
518
Murray Bridge
196
Population
Robina
25,659
Murray Bridge
15,043
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Robina | Murray Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.5/100 | 35.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.6/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.8 / 1k | 100.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 112 | — |
| Public transport stops | 92 | 39 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 518 | 196 |
| Planning activity | — | 193 |
| Green cover | 10.1% | 0.9% |
| Population | 25,659 | 15,043 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Robina is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Robina keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Robina is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access; Murray Bridge answers with schools and education options. Robina generally means more sought-after housing, while Murray Bridge leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Robina, while Murray Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.