Narrabundah vs Oaks Estate, ACT Suburb Comparison

Narrabundah for retirees and investment; Oaks Estate for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NarrabundahOaks Estate

Overall score

Narrabundah

48.0/100

Oaks Estate

27.3/100

Crime rate

Narrabundah

25.1 / 1k

Oaks Estate

87.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Narrabundah

184

Oaks Estate

22

Population

Narrabundah

6,455

Oaks Estate

375

Metric leadNarrabundah 8Oaks Estate 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNarrabundahOaks Estate
Overall score48.0/10027.3/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10044.3/100
Crime rate25.1 / 1k87.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools7—
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves42
Walkability59.0/1002.0/100
Nearby amenities18422
Planning activity111
Green cover10.1%26.0%
Population6,455375
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/104/10

Comparison summary

Narrabundah is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Oaks Estate is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Narrabundah sits closer to the city centre, whereas Oaks Estate is in a middle-ring position.

Narrabundah tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Oaks Estate stands out for a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Narrabundah sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Oaks Estate.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Narrabundah, while Oaks Estate remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons