Overall score
Oaks Estate
26.7/100
Symonston
26.7/100
Oaks Estate for retirees and investment; Symonston for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Oaks Estate
26.7/100
Symonston
26.7/100
Crime rate
Oaks Estate
87.1 / 1k
Symonston
78.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Oaks Estate
21
Symonston
55
Population
Oaks Estate
375
Symonston
655
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Oaks Estate | Symonston |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.7/100 | 26.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 12.8/100 | 8.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.1 / 1k | 78.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 12.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 21 | 55 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 20 |
| Population | 375 | 655 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Oaks Estate reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Symonston is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Oaks Estate sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Symonston is closer to the city centre.
Oaks Estate pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Symonston is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Oaks Estate sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Symonston.
Oaks Estate suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Symonston is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.