Overall score
Hume
16.1/100
Oaks Estate
27.3/100
Oaks Estate for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hume
16.1/100
Oaks Estate
27.3/100
Crime rate
Hume
260.8 / 1k
Oaks Estate
87.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hume
43
Oaks Estate
22
Population
Hume
395
Oaks Estate
375
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hume | Oaks Estate |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 16.1/100 | 27.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 0.6/100 | 44.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 260.8 / 1k | 87.1 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 6.5/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 43 | 22 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 1 |
| Green cover | 0.3% | 26.0% |
| Population | 395 | 375 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | — | 4/10 |
Hume is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, while Oaks Estate is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
On the data, Hume is stronger for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community; Oaks Estate answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.
Investors may find Hume the better fit, while retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Oaks Estate.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.