Nathan vs Upper Mount Gravatt, QLD suburb comparison

Nathan for retirees and families; Upper Mount Gravatt for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NathanUpper Mount Gravatt

Overall score

Nathan

58.7/100

Upper Mount Gravatt

71.5/100

Crime rate

Nathan

50.6 / 1k

Upper Mount Gravatt

60.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nathan

119

Upper Mount Gravatt

413

Population

Nathan

1,085

Upper Mount Gravatt

10,800

Metric leadNathan 3Upper Mount Gravatt 7across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNathanUpper Mount Gravatt
Overall score58.7/10071.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10037.1/100
Crime rate50.6 / 1k60.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Parks & reserves111
Public transport stops1184
Walkability47.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities119413
Population1,08510,800
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Nathan reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Upper Mount Gravatt is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Upper Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Nathan keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Nathan is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Upper Mount Gravatt answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.

Choose Nathan if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Upper Mount Gravatt for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons