Nathan vs Upper Mount Gravatt, QLD Suburb Comparison

Nathan for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NathanUpper Mount Gravatt

Overall score

Nathan

59.9/100

Upper Mount Gravatt

57.8/100

Crime rate

Nathan

88.8 / 1k

Upper Mount Gravatt

97.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nathan

139

Upper Mount Gravatt

414

Population

Nathan

1,085

Upper Mount Gravatt

10,800

Metric leadNathan 4Upper Mount Gravatt 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNathanUpper Mount Gravatt
Overall score59.9/10057.8/100
Housing (desirability)42.5/10050.8/100
Crime rate88.8 / 1k97.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves111
Public transport stops1184
Walkability47.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities139414
Green cover16.2%6.1%
Population1,08510,800
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Nathan reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Upper Mount Gravatt is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Upper Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Nathan keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Nathan is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Upper Mount Gravatt answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Choose Nathan if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Upper Mount Gravatt for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons