Newcomb vs South Geelong, VIC Suburb Comparison

Newcomb for beach lifestyle and value; South Geelong for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NewcombSouth Geelong

Overall score

Newcomb

48.2/100

South Geelong

52.2/100

Crime rate

Newcomb

168.5 / 1k

South Geelong

357.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Newcomb

157

South Geelong

322

Population

Newcomb

4,704

South Geelong

1,014

Metric leadNewcomb 6South Geelong 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNewcombSouth Geelong
Overall score48.2/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)80.1/10057.6/100
Crime rate168.5 / 1k357.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves124
Public transport stops3714
Walkability88.0/10043.0/100
Nearby amenities157322
Planning activity4739
Green cover0.7%15.3%
Population4,7041,014
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/108/10

Comparison summary

Newcomb reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; South Geelong is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Where Newcomb is shaped by the coast, South Geelong offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Newcomb is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; South Geelong answers with nearby cafés and amenities, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Newcomb generally means more approachable housing costs, while South Geelong leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Newcomb the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer South Geelong.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons