Newcomb vs St Albans Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Newcomb for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NewcombSt Albans Park

Overall score

Newcomb

48.2/100

St Albans Park

41.8/100

Crime rate

Newcomb

168.5 / 1k

St Albans Park

35.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Newcomb

157

St Albans Park

35

Population

Newcomb

4,704

St Albans Park

4,942

Metric leadNewcomb 7St Albans Park 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNewcombSt Albans Park
Overall score48.2/10041.8/100
Housing (desirability)80.1/10075.2/100
Crime rate168.5 / 1k35.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools83
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves126
Public transport stops3731
Walkability88.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities15735
Planning activity479
Green cover0.7%2.4%
Population4,7044,942
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Newcomb is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Where Newcomb is shaped by the coast, St Albans Park offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Newcomb is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; St Albans Park answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community.

People chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Newcomb the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer St Albans Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons