Overall score
O'Connell
30.7/100
Tannum Sands
44.9/100
Tannum Sands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
O'Connell
30.7/100
Tannum Sands
44.9/100
Crime rate
O'Connell
55.2 / 1k
Tannum Sands
54.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
O'Connell
0
Tannum Sands
3
Population
O'Connell
399
Tannum Sands
5,227
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | O'Connell | Tannum Sands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.7/100 | 44.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.7/100 | 49.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.2 / 1k | 54.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 18 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Population | 399 | 5,227 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, O'Connell is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Tannum Sands is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace.
O'Connell pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Tannum Sands is the better pick for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, O'Connell sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Tannum Sands.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tannum Sands, while O'Connell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.