Pimpama vs Craigieburn suburb comparison (QLD vs VIC)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Pimpama | Craigieburn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.5/100 | 75.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.1 / 1k | 65.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 73 |
| Public transport stops | 79 | 233 |
| Walkability | 69.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 918 |
| Planning activity | — | 190 |
| Population | 24,601 | 65,178 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesPimpama
- Best for familiesPimpama
- Best for best valueCraigieburn
Comparison summary
Across states, Pimpama is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Craigieburn is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Pimpama is stronger for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Craigieburn answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Pimpama generally means more sought-after housing, while Craigieburn leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Retirees and families may find Pimpama the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Craigieburn.