Pimpama vs Craigieburn suburb comparison (QLD vs VIC)

Pimpama for retirees; Craigieburn for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PimpamaCraigieburn

Overall score

Pimpama

67.1/100

Craigieburn

75.2/100

Crime rate

Pimpama

28.2 / 1k

Craigieburn

58.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pimpama

85

Craigieburn

918

Population

Pimpama

24,601

Craigieburn

65,178

Metric leadPimpama 2Craigieburn 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPimpamaCraigieburn
Overall score67.1/10075.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10081.2/100
Crime rate28.2 / 1k58.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Parks & reserves1473
Public transport stops79231
Walkability69.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities85918
Planning activity190
Population24,60165,178
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/104/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Pimpama is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Craigieburn is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Pimpama is stronger for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Craigieburn answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Pimpama generally means more sought-after housing, while Craigieburn leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Retirees may find Pimpama the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Craigieburn.

Related comparisons