Overall score
Pimpama
67.1/100
Craigieburn
75.2/100
Pimpama for retirees; Craigieburn for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Pimpama
67.1/100
Craigieburn
75.2/100
Crime rate
Pimpama
28.2 / 1k
Craigieburn
58.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Pimpama
85
Craigieburn
918
Population
Pimpama
24,601
Craigieburn
65,178
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Pimpama | Craigieburn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.1/100 | 75.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.2 / 1k | 58.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 73 |
| Public transport stops | 79 | 231 |
| Walkability | 69.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 918 |
| Planning activity | — | 190 |
| Population | 24,601 | 65,178 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Across states, Pimpama is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Craigieburn is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Pimpama is stronger for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Craigieburn answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Pimpama generally means more sought-after housing, while Craigieburn leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Retirees may find Pimpama the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Craigieburn.