Pimpama vs Murray Bridge suburb comparison (QLD vs SA)

Pimpama for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PimpamaMurray Bridge

Overall score

Pimpama

67.0/100

Murray Bridge

58.7/100

Crime rate

Pimpama

30.8 / 1k

Murray Bridge

100.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pimpama

85

Murray Bridge

192

Population

Pimpama

24,601

Murray Bridge

15,043

Metric leadPimpama 6Murray Bridge 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPimpamaMurray Bridge
Overall score67.0/10058.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10052.2/100
Crime rate30.8 / 1k100.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools113
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops7939
Walkability69.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities85192
Planning activity168
Population24,60115,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Pimpama is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Pimpama keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Pimpama tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Murray Bridge stands out for schools and education options and walkability. Pimpama generally means more sought-after housing, while Murray Bridge leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Pimpama, while Murray Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons