Overall score
Rangeway
35.7/100
Tarcoola Beach
39.3/100
Rangeway for retirees and investment; Tarcoola Beach for families and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rangeway
35.7/100
Tarcoola Beach
39.3/100
Crime rate
Rangeway
132.8 / 1k
Tarcoola Beach
132.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rangeway
32
Tarcoola Beach
27
Population
Rangeway
1,871
Tarcoola Beach
1,360
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rangeway | Tarcoola Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.7/100 | 39.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.4/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 132.8 / 1k | 132.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 2.8/100 | 2.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 13 |
| Walkability | 21.0/100 | 19.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 32 | 27 |
| Green cover | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| Population | 1,871 | 1,360 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Rangeway reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Tarcoola Beach is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Tarcoola Beach leans into coastal living, while Rangeway feels more inland and suburban in character.
Rangeway tends to lead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, while Tarcoola Beach stands out for housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Rangeway generally means more approachable housing costs, while Tarcoola Beach leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Choose Rangeway if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Tarcoola Beach for retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.