Overall score
Beachlands
39.7/100
Rangeway
35.7/100
Beachlands vs Rangeway, WA Suburb Comparison
Beachlands for investment and value; Rangeway for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BeachlandsRangeway
Crime rate
Beachlands
132.8 / 1k
Rangeway
132.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beachlands
22
Rangeway
32
Population
Beachlands
1,400
Rangeway
1,871
Metric leadBeachlands 7Rangeway 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesRangeway
- Best for investmentBeachlands
- Best for best valueBeachlands
- Best for best schoolsBeachlands
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beachlands | Rangeway |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.7/100 | 35.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.6/100 | 37.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 132.8 / 1k | 132.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 2.8/100 | 2.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 14 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 22 | 32 |
| Green cover | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Population | 1,400 | 1,871 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Beachlands reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Rangeway is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Beachlands tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, while Rangeway stands out for parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.
On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Beachlands, while Rangeway remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.