Rangeway vs Wandina, WA Suburb Comparison

Rangeway for retirees and families; Wandina for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RangewayWandina

Overall score

Rangeway

35.7/100

Wandina

39.4/100

Crime rate

Rangeway

132.8 / 1k

Wandina

132.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rangeway

32

Wandina

36

Population

Rangeway

1,871

Wandina

4,375

Metric leadRangeway 2Wandina 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRangewayWandina
Overall score35.7/10039.4/100
Housing (desirability)37.4/10035.9/100
Crime rate132.8 / 1k132.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Weather (desirability)2.8/1002.8/100
Parks & reserves310
Public transport stops1421
Walkability21.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities3236
Green cover3.0%4.9%
Population1,8714,375
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Rangeway is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Wandina is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Rangeway tends to lead on schools and education options, while Wandina stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Rangeway sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Wandina.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Rangeway the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wandina.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons