Robina vs Murray Bridge suburb comparison (QLD vs SA)

Robina for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RobinaMurray Bridge

Overall score

Robina

78.2/100

Murray Bridge

59.9/100

Crime rate

Robina

25.9 / 1k

Murray Bridge

87.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Robina

490

Murray Bridge

192

Population

Robina

25,659

Murray Bridge

15,043

Metric leadRobina 8Murray Bridge 1across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRobinaMurray Bridge
Overall score78.2/10059.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10052.2/100
Crime rate25.9 / 1k87.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools413
Parks & reserves112
Public transport stops9239
Walkability100.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities490192
Planning activity165
Population25,65915,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Robina is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Robina keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Robina is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Murray Bridge answers with schools and education options. Robina generally means more sought-after housing, while Murray Bridge leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Robina, while Murray Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons