Rutherford vs Windella, NSW suburb comparison

Rutherford for families and value; Windella for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RutherfordWindella

Overall score

Rutherford

61.7/100

Windella

36.4/100

Crime rate

Rutherford

95.4 / 1k

Windella

95.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rutherford

375

Windella

21

Population

Rutherford

13,091

Windella

845

Metric leadRutherford 6Windella 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRutherfordWindella
Overall score61.7/10036.4/100
Housing (desirability)76.1/10076.1/100
Crime rate95.4 / 1k95.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Parks & reserves41
Public transport stops26210
Walkability85.0/10015.0/100
Nearby amenities37521
Planning activity576
Population13,091845
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/1010/10

Comparison summary

Rutherford reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Windella is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Rutherford sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Windella is further out with more breathing room.

Rutherford tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Windella stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Rutherford sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Windella.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Rutherford the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Windella.

Related comparisons