Overall score
Rutherford
61.7/100
Windella
36.4/100
Rutherford for families and value; Windella for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rutherford
61.7/100
Windella
36.4/100
Crime rate
Rutherford
95.4 / 1k
Windella
95.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rutherford
375
Windella
21
Population
Rutherford
13,091
Windella
845
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rutherford | Windella |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.7/100 | 36.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.1/100 | 76.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.4 / 1k | 95.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 262 | 10 |
| Walkability | 85.0/100 | 15.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 375 | 21 |
| Planning activity | 57 | 6 |
| Population | 13,091 | 845 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 10/10 |
Rutherford reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Windella is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Rutherford sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Windella is further out with more breathing room.
Rutherford tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Windella stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Rutherford sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Windella.
Families and value-focused buyers may find Rutherford the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Windella.