Rutherford vs Windella, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rutherford for retirees and investment; Windella for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RutherfordWindella

Overall score

Rutherford

39.9/100

Windella

45.8/100

Crime rate

Rutherford

95.4 / 1k

Windella

95.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rutherford

376

Windella

21

Population

Rutherford

13,091

Windella

845

Metric leadRutherford 6Windella 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRutherfordWindella
Overall score39.9/10045.8/100
Housing (desirability)64.5/10041.5/100
Crime rate95.4 / 1k95.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves41
Public transport stops26210
Walkability85.0/10015.0/100
Nearby amenities37621
Planning activity617
Green cover4.5%12.9%
Population13,091845
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/1010/10

Comparison summary

Rutherford reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Windella is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Rutherford sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Windella is further out with more breathing room.

Rutherford tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, while Windella stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Rutherford the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Windella.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons