Overall score
Rutherford
39.9/100
Windella
45.8/100
Rutherford for retirees and investment; Windella for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rutherford
39.9/100
Windella
45.8/100
Crime rate
Rutherford
95.4 / 1k
Windella
95.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rutherford
376
Windella
21
Population
Rutherford
13,091
Windella
845
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rutherford | Windella |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 45.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.5/100 | 41.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.4 / 1k | 95.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 262 | 10 |
| Walkability | 85.0/100 | 15.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 376 | 21 |
| Planning activity | 61 | 7 |
| Green cover | 4.5% | 12.9% |
| Population | 13,091 | 845 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 10/10 |
Rutherford reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Windella is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Rutherford sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Windella is further out with more breathing room.
Rutherford tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, while Windella stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Rutherford the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Windella.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.