Overall score
Sassafras
40.0/100
Tecoma
48.9/100
Sassafras vs Tecoma, VIC suburb comparison
Tecoma for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
SassafrasTecoma
Crime rate
Sassafras
43.9 / 1k
Tecoma
27.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Sassafras
115
Tecoma
54
Population
Sassafras
970
Tecoma
2,064
Metric leadSassafras 2Tecoma 8across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Sassafras | Tecoma |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.0/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 33.9/100 | 57.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.9 / 1k | 27.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | — |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 23 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 115 | 54 |
| Planning activity | 26 | 23 |
| Population | 970 | 2,064 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Sassafras reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Tecoma is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Sassafras pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Tecoma is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tecoma, while Sassafras remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.