Sturt vs Warradale, SA suburb comparison

Sturt for investment and value; Warradale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SturtWarradale

Overall score

Sturt

51.7/100

Warradale

57.4/100

Crime rate

Sturt

48.6 / 1k

Warradale

27.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Sturt

62

Warradale

113

Population

Sturt

2,787

Warradale

5,801

Metric leadSturt 2Warradale 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySturtWarradale
Overall score51.7/10057.4/100
Housing (desirability)50.5/10037.8/100
Crime rate48.6 / 1k27.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Public transport stops1831
Walkability58.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities62113
Planning activity3160
Population2,7875,801
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Sturt reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Sturt pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Warradale is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Sturt generally means more approachable housing costs, while Warradale leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Warradale, while Sturt remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons