Trigg vs Watermans Bay, WA suburb comparison

Trigg for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

TriggWatermans Bay

Overall score

Trigg

51.0/100

Watermans Bay

45.2/100

Crime rate

Trigg

3761.0 / 1k

Watermans Bay

7978.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Trigg

44

Watermans Bay

17

Population

Trigg

2,855

Watermans Bay

1,369

Metric leadTrigg 8Watermans Bay 02 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryTriggWatermans Bay
Overall score51.0/10045.2/100
Housing (desirability)75.8/10061.6/100
Crime rate3761.0 / 1k7978.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools66
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops127
Walkability20.0/10012.5/100
Nearby amenities4417
Population2,8551,369
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Trigg reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Watermans Bay is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

On the data, Trigg is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Watermans Bay answers with an affluent, sought-after address and easy access to the coast.

On balance, retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer Trigg, while Watermans Bay remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons