Overall score
Upper Coomera
67.0/100
Murray Bridge
58.7/100
Upper Coomera for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Upper Coomera
67.0/100
Murray Bridge
58.7/100
Crime rate
Upper Coomera
29.7 / 1k
Murray Bridge
100.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Upper Coomera
167
Murray Bridge
192
Population
Upper Coomera
27,180
Murray Bridge
15,043
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Upper Coomera | Murray Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.0/100 | 58.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.7 / 1k | 100.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 34 | — |
| Public transport stops | 72 | 39 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 167 | 192 |
| Planning activity | — | 168 |
| Population | 27,180 | 15,043 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Upper Coomera is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Upper Coomera keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Upper Coomera pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Murray Bridge is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability. Upper Coomera generally means more sought-after housing, while Murray Bridge leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Upper Coomera, while Murray Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.