Upper Coomera vs Murray Bridge suburb comparison (QLD vs SA)

Upper Coomera for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Upper CoomeraMurray Bridge

Overall score

Upper Coomera

67.0/100

Murray Bridge

58.7/100

Crime rate

Upper Coomera

29.7 / 1k

Murray Bridge

100.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Upper Coomera

167

Murray Bridge

192

Population

Upper Coomera

27,180

Murray Bridge

15,043

Metric leadUpper Coomera 6Murray Bridge 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryUpper CoomeraMurray Bridge
Overall score67.0/10058.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10052.2/100
Crime rate29.7 / 1k100.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools213
Parks & reserves34
Public transport stops7239
Walkability63.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities167192
Planning activity168
Population27,18015,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Upper Coomera is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Upper Coomera keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Upper Coomera pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Murray Bridge is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability. Upper Coomera generally means more sought-after housing, while Murray Bridge leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Upper Coomera, while Murray Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons