Overall score
Uralba
53.9/100
Wardell
39.4/100
Uralba vs Wardell, NSW Suburb Comparison
Uralba for retirees and value; Wardell for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
UralbaWardell
Crime rate
Uralba
39.3 / 1k
Wardell
38.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Uralba
1
Wardell
6
Population
Uralba
266
Wardell
830
Metric leadUralba 5Wardell 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Uralba | Wardell |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.9/100 | 39.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.3/100 | 63.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.3 / 1k | 38.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 47.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 79 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 8 |
| Green cover | 21.9% | 3.0% |
| Population | 266 | 830 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Uralba reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Wardell is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Uralba pulls ahead on housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Wardell is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Uralba suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Wardell is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.