Uralba vs Wardell, NSW suburb comparison

Uralba for retirees and families; Wardell for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

UralbaWardell

Overall score

Uralba

31.0/100

Wardell

34.6/100

Crime rate

Uralba

39.3 / 1k

Wardell

38.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Uralba

0

Wardell

3

Population

Uralba

266

Wardell

830

Metric leadUralba 3Wardell 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryUralbaWardell
Overall score31.0/10034.6/100
Housing (desirability)79.8/10075.4/100
Crime rate39.3 / 1k38.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops2179
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities03
Planning activity16
Population266830
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Uralba reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Wardell is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Uralba pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Wardell is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Uralba generally means more sought-after housing, while Wardell leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Uralba suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Wardell is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons