Uralba vs Wardell, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Uralba | Wardell |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.1/100 | 34.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.8/100 | 75.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.4 / 1k | 41.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 79 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 4 |
| Population | 266 | 830 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 2/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Uralba reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Wardell is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Uralba pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Wardell is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Uralba generally means more sought-after housing, while Wardell leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Uralba suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Wardell is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.