Aspendale vs Chelsea Heights, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Aspendale | Chelsea Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.4/100 | 67.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.8/100 | 63.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.7 / 1k | 61.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 26 | 41 |
| Walkability | 94.0/100 | 98.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 147 | 117 |
| Planning activity | 93 | 39 |
| Population | 7,285 | 5,393 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for beach lifestyleAspendale
- Best for investmentAspendale
- Best for best valueChelsea Heights
- Best for best schoolsAspendale
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Aspendale is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Aspendale leans into coastal living, while Chelsea Heights feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Aspendale is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Chelsea Heights answers with housing affordability and public transport access.
Choose Aspendale if you are weighing people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors; lean toward Chelsea Heights for value-focused buyers.