Aspendale vs Chelsea, VIC suburb comparison

Aspendale for investment and schools; Chelsea for beach lifestyle and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AspendaleChelsea

Overall score

Aspendale

66.6/100

Chelsea

70.2/100

Crime rate

Aspendale

52.7 / 1k

Chelsea

67.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale

147

Chelsea

363

Population

Aspendale

7,285

Chelsea

8,347

Metric leadAspendale 4Chelsea 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendaleChelsea
Overall score66.6/10070.2/100
Housing (desirability)53.8/10057.0/100
Crime rate52.7 / 1k67.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Parks & reserves95
Public transport stops2548
Walkability94.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities147363
Planning activity9385
Population7,2858,347
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Aspendale is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Chelsea is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

Aspendale pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Chelsea is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access.

Choose Aspendale if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Chelsea for people chasing a beach lifestyle and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons