Aspendale vs Chelsea, VIC Suburb Comparison

Aspendale for families and schools; Chelsea for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AspendaleChelsea

Overall score

Aspendale

60.9/100

Chelsea

61.7/100

Crime rate

Aspendale

43.8 / 1k

Chelsea

63.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale

228

Chelsea

386

Population

Aspendale

7,285

Chelsea

8,347

Metric leadAspendale 4Chelsea 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendaleChelsea
Overall score60.9/10061.7/100
Housing (desirability)54.7/10075.8/100
Crime rate43.8 / 1k63.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves95
Public transport stops2548
Walkability94.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities228386
Planning activity9385
Green cover8.6%13.3%
Population7,2858,347
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Aspendale is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Chelsea is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

Aspendale pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Chelsea is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Aspendale if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Chelsea for people chasing a beach lifestyle and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons