Aspendale vs Chelsea, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Aspendale | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.4/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.8/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.7 / 1k | 71.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 26 | 49 |
| Walkability | 94.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 147 | 363 |
| Planning activity | 93 | 85 |
| Population | 7,285 | 8,347 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Aspendale is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Chelsea is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
Aspendale pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Chelsea is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access.
Choose Aspendale if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Chelsea for people chasing a beach lifestyle and value-focused buyers.