Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea, VIC suburb comparison

Aspendale Gardens for retirees and families; Chelsea for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aspendale GardensChelsea

Overall score

Aspendale Gardens

67.5/100

Chelsea

70.2/100

Crime rate

Aspendale Gardens

22.7 / 1k

Chelsea

67.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale Gardens

113

Chelsea

363

Population

Aspendale Gardens

6,427

Chelsea

8,347

Metric leadAspendale Gardens 3Chelsea 8across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendale GardensChelsea
Overall score67.5/10070.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.0/10057.0/100
Crime rate22.7 / 1k67.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops1748
Walkability81.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities113363
Planning activity785
Population6,4278,347
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Chelsea is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Chelsea leans into coastal living, while Aspendale Gardens feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Aspendale Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Chelsea answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.

Retirees and families may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer Chelsea.

Related comparisons