Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.5/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.3 / 1k | 71.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 49 |
| Walkability | 81.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 113 | 363 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 85 |
| Population | 6,427 | 8,347 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesAspendale Gardens
- Best for familiesAspendale Gardens
- Best for beach lifestyleChelsea
- Best for investmentChelsea
- Best for best valueChelsea
- Best for best schoolsAspendale Gardens
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Chelsea is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Chelsea leans into coastal living, while Aspendale Gardens feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Aspendale Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Chelsea answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.
Retirees and families may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer Chelsea.