Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea, VIC Suburb Comparison

Aspendale Gardens for families and schools; Chelsea for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aspendale GardensChelsea

Overall score

Aspendale Gardens

62.3/100

Chelsea

61.7/100

Crime rate

Aspendale Gardens

20.6 / 1k

Chelsea

63.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale Gardens

144

Chelsea

386

Population

Aspendale Gardens

6,427

Chelsea

8,347

Metric leadAspendale Gardens 4Chelsea 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendale GardensChelsea
Overall score62.3/10061.7/100
Housing (desirability)50.5/10075.8/100
Crime rate20.6 / 1k63.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops1748
Walkability81.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities144386
Planning activity785
Green cover10.8%13.3%
Population6,4278,347
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Chelsea is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Chelsea leans into coastal living, while Aspendale Gardens feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Aspendale Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Chelsea answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chelsea.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons