Aspendale Gardens vs Carrum, VIC Suburb Comparison

Aspendale Gardens for families and schools; Carrum for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aspendale GardensCarrum

Overall score

Aspendale Gardens

62.3/100

Carrum

60.2/100

Crime rate

Aspendale Gardens

20.6 / 1k

Carrum

60.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale Gardens

144

Carrum

195

Population

Aspendale Gardens

6,427

Carrum

4,239

Metric leadAspendale Gardens 6Carrum 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendale GardensCarrum
Overall score62.3/10060.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.5/10070.7/100
Crime rate20.6 / 1k60.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops1739
Walkability81.5/10090.0/100
Nearby amenities144195
Planning activity790
Green cover10.8%9.3%
Population6,4274,239
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Carrum is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Carrum leans into coastal living, while Aspendale Gardens feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Aspendale Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook; Carrum answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Carrum.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons