Overall score
Aspendale Gardens
67.5/100
Patterson Lakes
66.7/100
Aspendale Gardens for retirees and families; Patterson Lakes for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aspendale Gardens
67.5/100
Patterson Lakes
66.7/100
Crime rate
Aspendale Gardens
22.7 / 1k
Patterson Lakes
52.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aspendale Gardens
113
Patterson Lakes
123
Population
Aspendale Gardens
6,427
Patterson Lakes
7,793
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aspendale Gardens | Patterson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.5/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 24.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.7 / 1k | 52.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 29 |
| Walkability | 81.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 113 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 36 |
| Population | 6,427 | 7,793 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Aspendale Gardens tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Patterson Lakes stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.
Aspendale Gardens suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Patterson Lakes is the stronger match for investors.