Chelsea Heights vs Patterson Lakes, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.5/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.2/100 | 24.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.2 / 1k | 55.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 29 |
| Walkability | 98.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 39 | 36 |
| Population | 5,393 | 7,793 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for investmentChelsea Heights
- Best for best valueChelsea Heights
Comparison summary
Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Patterson Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Chelsea Heights is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chelsea Heights, while Patterson Lakes remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.