Overall score
Chelsea Heights
69.7/100
Patterson Lakes
66.7/100
Chelsea Heights for investment and value; Patterson Lakes for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chelsea Heights
69.7/100
Patterson Lakes
66.7/100
Crime rate
Chelsea Heights
60.4 / 1k
Patterson Lakes
52.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chelsea Heights
117
Patterson Lakes
123
Population
Chelsea Heights
5,393
Patterson Lakes
7,793
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.7/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.2/100 | 24.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.4 / 1k | 52.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 29 |
| Walkability | 98.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 39 | 36 |
| Population | 5,393 | 7,793 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Patterson Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Chelsea Heights is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Chelsea Heights the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Patterson Lakes.