Chelsea Heights vs Patterson Lakes, VIC suburb comparison

Chelsea Heights for investment and value; Patterson Lakes for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chelsea HeightsPatterson Lakes

Overall score

Chelsea Heights

69.7/100

Patterson Lakes

66.7/100

Crime rate

Chelsea Heights

60.4 / 1k

Patterson Lakes

52.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelsea Heights

117

Patterson Lakes

123

Population

Chelsea Heights

5,393

Patterson Lakes

7,793

Metric leadChelsea Heights 3Patterson Lakes 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelsea HeightsPatterson Lakes
Overall score69.7/10066.7/100
Housing (desirability)63.2/10024.7/100
Crime rate60.4 / 1k52.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Parks & reserves78
Public transport stops4129
Walkability98.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities117123
Planning activity3936
Population5,3937,793
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Patterson Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Chelsea Heights is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Chelsea Heights the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Patterson Lakes.

Related comparisons