Overall score
Chelsea Heights
62.9/100
Patterson Lakes
60.1/100
Chelsea Heights for value; Patterson Lakes for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chelsea Heights
62.9/100
Patterson Lakes
60.1/100
Crime rate
Chelsea Heights
52.3 / 1k
Patterson Lakes
54.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chelsea Heights
133
Patterson Lakes
190
Population
Chelsea Heights
5,393
Patterson Lakes
7,793
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chelsea Heights | Patterson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.9/100 | 60.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.9/100 | 52.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 52.3 / 1k | 54.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 29 |
| Walkability | 98.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 133 | 190 |
| Planning activity | 39 | 36 |
| Green cover | 12.0% | 7.7% |
| Population | 5,393 | 7,793 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Patterson Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Chelsea Heights is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and overall desirability; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Chelsea Heights the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Patterson Lakes.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.