Chelsea Heights vs Patterson Lakes, VIC Suburb Comparison

Chelsea Heights for value; Patterson Lakes for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chelsea HeightsPatterson Lakes

Overall score

Chelsea Heights

62.9/100

Patterson Lakes

60.1/100

Crime rate

Chelsea Heights

52.3 / 1k

Patterson Lakes

54.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelsea Heights

133

Patterson Lakes

190

Population

Chelsea Heights

5,393

Patterson Lakes

7,793

Metric leadChelsea Heights 5Patterson Lakes 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelsea HeightsPatterson Lakes
Overall score62.9/10060.1/100
Housing (desirability)62.9/10052.3/100
Crime rate52.3 / 1k54.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves78
Public transport stops4129
Walkability98.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities133190
Planning activity3936
Green cover12.0%7.7%
Population5,3937,793
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Patterson Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Chelsea Heights is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and overall desirability; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Chelsea Heights the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Patterson Lakes.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons