Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea Heights, VIC Suburb Comparison

Aspendale Gardens for families and schools; Chelsea Heights for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aspendale GardensChelsea Heights

Overall score

Aspendale Gardens

62.3/100

Chelsea Heights

62.9/100

Crime rate

Aspendale Gardens

20.6 / 1k

Chelsea Heights

52.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale Gardens

144

Chelsea Heights

133

Population

Aspendale Gardens

6,427

Chelsea Heights

5,393

Metric leadAspendale Gardens 5Chelsea Heights 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendale GardensChelsea Heights
Overall score62.3/10062.9/100
Housing (desirability)50.5/10062.9/100
Crime rate20.6 / 1k52.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops1741
Walkability81.5/10098.0/100
Nearby amenities144133
Planning activity739
Green cover10.8%12.0%
Population6,4275,393
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Aspendale Gardens keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Aspendale Gardens tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, while Chelsea Heights stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chelsea Heights.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons