Overall score
Aspendale Gardens
67.5/100
Chelsea Heights
69.7/100
Aspendale Gardens for retirees and families; Chelsea Heights for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aspendale Gardens
67.5/100
Chelsea Heights
69.7/100
Crime rate
Aspendale Gardens
22.7 / 1k
Chelsea Heights
60.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aspendale Gardens
113
Chelsea Heights
117
Population
Aspendale Gardens
6,427
Chelsea Heights
5,393
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.5/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 63.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.7 / 1k | 60.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 41 |
| Walkability | 81.5/100 | 98.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 113 | 117 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 39 |
| Population | 6,427 | 5,393 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Aspendale Gardens keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Aspendale Gardens tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Chelsea Heights stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees and families may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chelsea Heights.