Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea Heights, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.5/100 | 67.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 63.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.3 / 1k | 61.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 41 |
| Walkability | 81.5/100 | 98.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 113 | 117 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 39 |
| Population | 6,427 | 5,393 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesAspendale Gardens
- Best for familiesAspendale Gardens
- Best for investmentChelsea Heights
- Best for best valueChelsea Heights
- Best for best schoolsAspendale Gardens
Comparison summary
Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Aspendale Gardens keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Aspendale Gardens tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Chelsea Heights stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees and families may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chelsea Heights.