Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea Heights, VIC suburb comparison

Aspendale Gardens for retirees and families; Chelsea Heights for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aspendale GardensChelsea Heights

Overall score

Aspendale Gardens

67.5/100

Chelsea Heights

69.7/100

Crime rate

Aspendale Gardens

22.7 / 1k

Chelsea Heights

60.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aspendale Gardens

113

Chelsea Heights

117

Population

Aspendale Gardens

6,427

Chelsea Heights

5,393

Metric leadAspendale Gardens 4Chelsea Heights 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAspendale GardensChelsea Heights
Overall score67.5/10069.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.0/10063.2/100
Crime rate22.7 / 1k60.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops1741
Walkability81.5/10098.0/100
Nearby amenities113117
Planning activity739
Population6,4275,393
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Aspendale Gardens is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Aspendale Gardens keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Aspendale Gardens tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Chelsea Heights stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Retirees and families may find Aspendale Gardens the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chelsea Heights.

Related comparisons