Chelsea Heights vs Waterways, VIC Suburb Comparison

Chelsea Heights for retirees and investment; Waterways for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chelsea HeightsWaterways

Overall score

Chelsea Heights

62.9/100

Waterways

48.2/100

Crime rate

Chelsea Heights

52.3 / 1k

Waterways

28.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelsea Heights

133

Waterways

39

Population

Chelsea Heights

5,393

Waterways

2,422

Metric leadChelsea Heights 9Waterways 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelsea HeightsWaterways
Overall score62.9/10048.2/100
Housing (desirability)62.9/10040.9/100
Crime rate52.3 / 1k28.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools42
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops415
Walkability98.0/1009.5/100
Nearby amenities13339
Planning activity3915
Green cover12.0%5.8%
Population5,3932,422
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Waterways is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Waterways keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Chelsea Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Waterways is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Choose Chelsea Heights if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Waterways for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons