Chelsea Heights vs Waterways, VIC suburb comparison

Chelsea Heights for investment and value; Waterways for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chelsea HeightsWaterways

Overall score

Chelsea Heights

69.7/100

Waterways

47.9/100

Crime rate

Chelsea Heights

60.4 / 1k

Waterways

32.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelsea Heights

117

Waterways

20

Population

Chelsea Heights

5,393

Waterways

2,422

Metric leadChelsea Heights 8Waterways 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelsea HeightsWaterways
Overall score69.7/10047.9/100
Housing (desirability)63.2/10042.7/100
Crime rate60.4 / 1k32.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools42
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops415
Walkability98.0/1009.5/100
Nearby amenities11720
Planning activity3915
Population5,3932,422
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chelsea Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Waterways is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Chelsea Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Waterways keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Chelsea Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Waterways is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Chelsea Heights if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Waterways for retirees and families.

Related comparisons