Chelsea vs Patterson Lakes, VIC suburb comparison

Chelsea for beach lifestyle and investment; Patterson Lakes for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChelseaPatterson Lakes

Overall score

Chelsea

70.2/100

Patterson Lakes

66.7/100

Crime rate

Chelsea

67.7 / 1k

Patterson Lakes

52.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelsea

363

Patterson Lakes

123

Population

Chelsea

8,347

Patterson Lakes

7,793

Metric leadChelsea 6Patterson Lakes 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelseaPatterson Lakes
Overall score70.2/10066.7/100
Housing (desirability)57.0/10024.7/100
Crime rate67.7 / 1k52.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Parks & reserves58
Public transport stops4829
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities363123
Planning activity8536
Population8,3477,793
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Chelsea reads as a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Where Chelsea is shaped by the coast, Patterson Lakes offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Chelsea is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Choose Chelsea if you are weighing people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors; lean toward Patterson Lakes for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons