Chelsea vs Patterson Lakes, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Chelsea | Patterson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.8/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.0/100 | 24.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 71.3 / 1k | 55.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 49 | 29 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 363 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 85 | 36 |
| Population | 8,347 | 7,793 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Chelsea reads as a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Where Chelsea is shaped by the coast, Patterson Lakes offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
On the data, Chelsea is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
On balance, people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer Chelsea, while Patterson Lakes remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.