Overall score
Chelsea
70.2/100
Patterson Lakes
66.7/100
Chelsea for beach lifestyle and investment; Patterson Lakes for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chelsea
70.2/100
Patterson Lakes
66.7/100
Crime rate
Chelsea
67.7 / 1k
Patterson Lakes
52.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chelsea
363
Patterson Lakes
123
Population
Chelsea
8,347
Patterson Lakes
7,793
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chelsea | Patterson Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.2/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.0/100 | 24.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 67.7 / 1k | 52.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 29 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 363 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 85 | 36 |
| Population | 8,347 | 7,793 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Chelsea reads as a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Patterson Lakes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Where Chelsea is shaped by the coast, Patterson Lakes offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
On the data, Chelsea is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Patterson Lakes answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
Choose Chelsea if you are weighing people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors; lean toward Patterson Lakes for families and households prioritising schools.