Bakers Hill vs Northam, WA Suburb Comparison

Bakers Hill for schools; Northam for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bakers HillNortham

Overall score

Bakers Hill

31.4/100

Northam

41.5/100

Crime rate

Bakers Hill

50.5 / 1k

Northam

50.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bakers Hill

1

Northam

74

Population

Bakers Hill

1,276

Northam

6,679

Metric leadBakers Hill 3Northam 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBakers HillNortham
Overall score31.4/10041.5/100
Housing (desirability)40.4/10047.8/100
Crime rate50.5 / 1k50.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Weather (desirability)23.4/1006.0/100
Parks & reserves—5
Public transport stops23
Walkability3.0/10039.5/100
Nearby amenities174
Green cover25.2%7.2%
Population1,2766,679
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Northam is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

On the data, Bakers Hill is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Northam answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability. Bakers Hill generally means more mid-market housing value, while Northam leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Investors may find Bakers Hill the better fit, while retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Northam.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons