Overall score
Bakers Hill
28.1/100
Northam
48.3/100
Bakers Hill vs Northam, WA suburb comparison
Bakers Hill for investment; Northam for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bakers HillNortham
Crime rate
Bakers Hill
1680.9 / 1k
Northam
321.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bakers Hill
0
Northam
38
Population
Bakers Hill
1,276
Northam
6,679
Metric leadBakers Hill 2Northam 7across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesNortham
- Best for familiesNortham
- Best for investmentBakers Hill
- Best for best valueNortham
- Best for best schoolsNortham
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bakers Hill | Northam |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.1/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.5/100 | 31.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 1680.9 / 1k | 321.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 3 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 38 |
| Population | 1,276 | 6,679 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Northam is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
On the data, Bakers Hill is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Northam answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Bakers Hill generally means more mid-market housing value, while Northam leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Investors may find Bakers Hill the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Northam.