Bakers Hill vs Burlong, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bakers Hill | Burlong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 21.1/100 | 15.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.5/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 1 |
| Population | 1,276 | 340 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBakers Hill
- Best for familiesBakers Hill
- Best for investmentBakers Hill
- Best for best valueBakers Hill
- Best for best schoolsBakers Hill
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Burlong is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Bakers Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Burlong is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bakers Hill, while Burlong remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.