Bakers Hill vs Wundowie, WA Suburb Comparison

Bakers Hill for schools; Wundowie for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bakers HillWundowie

Overall score

Bakers Hill

31.4/100

Wundowie

35.4/100

Crime rate

Bakers Hill

50.5 / 1k

Wundowie

50.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bakers Hill

1

Wundowie

16

Population

Bakers Hill

1,276

Wundowie

1,372

Metric leadBakers Hill 1Wundowie 73 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBakers HillWundowie
Overall score31.4/10035.4/100
Housing (desirability)40.4/10047.4/100
Crime rate50.5 / 1k50.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Public transport stops224
Walkability3.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities116
Green cover25.2%34.5%
Population1,2761,372
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Wundowie is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wundowie sits among greener hillside streets, while Bakers Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Bakers Hill is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wundowie answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Bakers Hill generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wundowie leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bakers Hill, while Wundowie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons