Bakers Hill vs Wundowie, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bakers Hill | Wundowie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 21.1/100 | 26.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.5/100 | 33.3/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 24 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 13 |
| Population | 1,276 | 1,372 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBakers Hill
- Best for familiesBakers Hill
- Best for investmentBakers Hill
- Best for best schoolsBakers Hill
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Wundowie is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wundowie sits among greener hillside streets, while Bakers Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Bakers Hill is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wundowie answers with public transport access and walkability. Bakers Hill generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wundowie leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bakers Hill, while Wundowie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.