Bakers Hill vs Wundowie, WA suburb comparison

Bakers Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bakers HillWundowie

Overall score

Bakers Hill

28.1/100

Wundowie

33.9/100

Crime rate

Bakers Hill

1680.9 / 1k

Wundowie

1563.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bakers Hill

0

Wundowie

13

Population

Bakers Hill

1,276

Wundowie

1,372

Metric leadBakers Hill 2Wundowie 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBakers HillWundowie
Overall score28.1/10033.9/100
Housing (desirability)41.5/10033.3/100
Crime rate1680.9 / 1k1563.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Public transport stops224
Walkability3.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities013
Population1,2761,372
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Wundowie is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wundowie sits among greener hillside streets, while Bakers Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Bakers Hill is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wundowie answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Bakers Hill generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wundowie leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bakers Hill, while Wundowie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons