Overall score
Clackline
32.0/100
Wundowie
35.4/100
Clackline for investment; Wundowie for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clackline
32.0/100
Wundowie
35.4/100
Crime rate
Clackline
50.5 / 1k
Wundowie
50.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clackline
26
Wundowie
16
Population
Clackline
330
Wundowie
1,372
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clackline | Wundowie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.0/100 | 35.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.7/100 | 47.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.5 / 1k | 50.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 24 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 16 |
| Green cover | 8.2% | 34.5% |
| Population | 330 | 1,372 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Clackline is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Wundowie is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wundowie sits among greener hillside streets, while Clackline keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Clackline is stronger for housing affordability, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Wundowie answers with public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability. Clackline generally means more sought-after housing, while Wundowie leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Families and investors may find Clackline the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wundowie.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.