Clackline vs Wundowie, WA Suburb Comparison

Clackline for investment; Wundowie for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClacklineWundowie

Overall score

Clackline

32.0/100

Wundowie

35.4/100

Crime rate

Clackline

50.5 / 1k

Wundowie

50.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clackline

26

Wundowie

16

Population

Clackline

330

Wundowie

1,372

Metric leadClackline 2Wundowie 53 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClacklineWundowie
Overall score32.0/10035.4/100
Housing (desirability)61.7/10047.4/100
Crime rate50.5 / 1k50.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Public transport stops124
Walkability1.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2616
Green cover8.2%34.5%
Population3301,372
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clackline is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Wundowie is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wundowie sits among greener hillside streets, while Clackline keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Clackline is stronger for housing affordability, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Wundowie answers with public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability. Clackline generally means more sought-after housing, while Wundowie leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Families and investors may find Clackline the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wundowie.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons