Clackline vs Northam, WA Suburb Comparison

Clackline for investment; Northam for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClacklineNortham

Overall score

Clackline

32.0/100

Northam

41.5/100

Crime rate

Clackline

50.5 / 1k

Northam

50.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clackline

26

Northam

74

Population

Clackline

330

Northam

6,679

Metric leadClackline 3Northam 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClacklineNortham
Overall score32.0/10041.5/100
Housing (desirability)61.7/10047.8/100
Crime rate50.5 / 1k50.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—6
Weather (desirability)23.4/1006.0/100
Parks & reserves—5
Public transport stops13
Walkability1.5/10039.5/100
Nearby amenities2674
Green cover8.2%7.2%
Population3306,679
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Clackline is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Northam is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Clackline pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Northam is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Clackline generally means more sought-after housing, while Northam leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Clackline if you are weighing investors; lean toward Northam for retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons