Burlong vs Clackline, WA Suburb Comparison

Clackline for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BurlongClackline

Overall score

Burlong

21.9/100

Clackline

32.0/100

Crime rate

Burlong

50.5 / 1k

Clackline

50.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burlong

3

Clackline

26

Population

Burlong

340

Clackline

330

Metric leadBurlong 2Clackline 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurlongClackline
Overall score21.9/10032.0/100
Housing (desirability)11.3/10061.7/100
Crime rate50.5 / 1k50.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)6.0/10023.4/100
Public transport stops—1
Walkability0.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities326
Green cover0.3%8.2%
Population340330
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Burlong reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Clackline is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Burlong is stronger for overall desirability, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Clackline answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Burlong sits in a approachable band, compared with a expensive feel in Clackline.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Clackline, while Burlong remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons