Overall score
Bakers Hill
31.4/100
Clackline
32.0/100
Bakers Hill vs Clackline, WA Suburb Comparison
Bakers Hill for retirees and families; Clackline for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bakers HillClackline
Crime rate
Bakers Hill
50.5 / 1k
Clackline
50.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bakers Hill
1
Clackline
26
Population
Bakers Hill
1,276
Clackline
330
Metric leadBakers Hill 5Clackline 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBakers Hill
- Best for familiesBakers Hill
- Best for investmentClackline
- Best for best schoolsBakers Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bakers Hill | Clackline |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.4/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.4/100 | 61.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.5 / 1k | 50.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 26 |
| Green cover | 25.2% | 8.2% |
| Population | 1,276 | 330 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Clackline is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Bakers Hill tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, while Clackline stands out for nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Bakers Hill sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Clackline.
Bakers Hill suits retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Clackline is the stronger match for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.