Bakers Hill vs Clackline, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bakers Hill | Clackline |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 21.1/100 | 13.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.5/100 | 37.5/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 16 |
| Population | 1,276 | 330 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBakers Hill
- Best for familiesBakers Hill
- Best for investmentBakers Hill
- Best for best valueBakers Hill
- Best for best schoolsBakers Hill
Comparison summary
Bakers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Clackline is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Bakers Hill tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Clackline stands out for nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Bakers Hill sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Clackline.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bakers Hill, while Clackline remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.