Baulkham Hills vs Gosnells suburb comparison (NSW vs WA)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Baulkham Hills | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.6/100 | 57.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.8 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 460 | 143 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 285 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 50 | — |
| Population | 37,415 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBaulkham Hills
- Best for familiesBaulkham Hills
- Best for investmentBaulkham Hills
- Best for best valueBaulkham Hills
Comparison summary
Baulkham Hills (NSW) is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Baulkham Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Gosnells keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Baulkham Hills pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Baulkham Hills sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Baulkham Hills, while Gosnells remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.