Campbell vs Griffith, ACT suburb comparison

Campbell for retirees and families; Griffith for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CampbellGriffith

Overall score

Campbell

65.9/100

Griffith

67.1/100

Crime rate

Campbell

7.7 / 1k

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Campbell

446

Griffith

214

Population

Campbell

6,564

Griffith

5,328

Metric leadCampbell 5Griffith 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCampbellGriffith
Overall score65.9/10067.1/100
Housing (desirability)3.1/10018.0/100
Crime rate7.7 / 1k26.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools310
Parks & reserves92
Walkability98.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities446214
Planning activity511
Population6,5645,328
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Campbell is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Campbell is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Griffith answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.

Campbell suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Griffith is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons