Casey vs Moncrieff, ACT suburb comparison

Casey for investment and value; Moncrieff for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaseyMoncrieff

Overall score

Casey

64.9/100

Moncrieff

57.7/100

Crime rate

Casey

9.5 / 1k

Moncrieff

11.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Casey

118

Moncrieff

77

Population

Casey

6,471

Moncrieff

5,310

Metric leadCasey 6Moncrieff 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaseyMoncrieff
Overall score64.9/10057.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.5 / 1k11.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools46
Parks & reserves23
Walkability56.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities11877
Planning activity13
Population6,4715,310
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Casey is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Moncrieff is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Casey pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Moncrieff is the better pick for schools and education options and parks and reserves.

Retirees and families may find Casey the better fit, while investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Moncrieff.

Related comparisons