Forde vs Moncrieff, ACT suburb comparison

Forde for retirees; Moncrieff for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FordeMoncrieff

Overall score

Forde

60.9/100

Moncrieff

57.7/100

Crime rate

Forde

7.4 / 1k

Moncrieff

11.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forde

588

Moncrieff

77

Population

Forde

4,435

Moncrieff

5,310

Metric leadForde 4Moncrieff 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFordeMoncrieff
Overall score60.9/10057.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate7.4 / 1k11.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Parks & reserves23
Walkability56.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities58877
Planning activity133
Population4,4355,310
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Forde is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Moncrieff is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Forde tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Moncrieff stands out for schools and education options and parks and reserves.

Forde suits retirees and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Moncrieff is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons