Bonner vs Moncrieff, ACT Suburb Comparison

Bonner for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BonnerMoncrieff

Overall score

Bonner

54.3/100

Moncrieff

45.0/100

Crime rate

Bonner

11.2 / 1k

Moncrieff

11.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bonner

93

Moncrieff

86

Population

Bonner

7,339

Moncrieff

5,310

Metric leadBonner 6Moncrieff 23 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBonnerMoncrieff
Overall score54.3/10045.0/100
Housing (desirability)40.0/10041.9/100
Crime rate11.2 / 1k11.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves—3
Walkability47.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities9386
Planning activity34
Green cover20.3%15.8%
Population7,3395,310
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bonner is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Moncrieff is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Bonner is stronger for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Moncrieff answers with schools and education options.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Moncrieff, while Bonner remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons