Overall score
Bonner
54.3/100
Taylor
40.4/100
Bonner vs Taylor, ACT Suburb Comparison
Bonner for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BonnerTaylor
Crime rate
Bonner
11.2 / 1k
Taylor
20.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bonner
93
Taylor
158
Population
Bonner
7,339
Taylor
2,220
Metric leadBonner 6Taylor 23 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bonner | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.3/100 | 40.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.0/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.2 / 1k | 20.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 93 | 158 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 11 |
| Green cover | 20.3% | 24.0% |
| Population | 7,339 | 2,220 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bonner is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Taylor is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Bonner pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and overall desirability, whereas Taylor is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Bonner if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Taylor for investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.