Overall score
Ngunnawal
51.5/100
Taylor
40.4/100
Ngunnawal for investment and value; Taylor for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ngunnawal
51.5/100
Taylor
40.4/100
Crime rate
Ngunnawal
12.3 / 1k
Taylor
20.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ngunnawal
123
Taylor
158
Population
Ngunnawal
10,957
Taylor
2,220
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ngunnawal | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.5/100 | 40.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.1/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.3 / 1k | 20.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 123 | 158 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 11 |
| Green cover | 8.4% | 24.0% |
| Population | 10,957 | 2,220 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Ngunnawal is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Taylor is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Ngunnawal pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Taylor is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Ngunnawal suits retirees, families, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Taylor is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.